Friday, October 5, 2012

AFTER SOME signs THAT THE ECONOMY IS SHOWING further SIGNS OF IMPROVEMENT, for his own ends, Mitt wishes it wasn't doing so well and tells everyone to not look for light at the end of the tunnel.  that he can benefit instead of you seeing the glass half full.    this is unamerican.  this is not american exceptionalism.  




Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Are You Keeping Your Plans Secret Because They're Too Good?

ROMNEYS ideas are being kept secret because  As Obama puts it "they're too good?"



Obama Zings Romney: Are You Keeping Your Plans Secret Because They're Too Good?


President Barack Obama on Wednesday took a jab at Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, joking that the GOP hopeful must have refused to release details about his policies because they were "too good."
During the first 2012 presidential debate in Colorado, Obama noted that Romney had vowed to repeal health care reform but not given any details about what would take its place.
"But when Gov. Romney says he'll replace it with something, but can't detail how it will be, in fact, replaced — and the reason he set up the system he did in Massachusetts was because there isn't a better way of dealing with the preexisting conditions problem," the president explained. "He says he will close deductions and loopholes for his tax plan — that how it will be paid for, we don't know the details. He says that he's going to replace Dodd-Frank, Wall Street reform, but we don't know exactly which ones, he won't tell us. He now says he'll replace Obamacare — and ensure all the good things in it will be in there — and you don't have to worry."
"And at some point I think the American people have to ask themselves: Is the reason that Gov. Romney is keeping all these plans to replace secret, because they are too good?" Obama asked. "Is it because that somehow middle class families will benefit too much from them?"
"No, the reason is because when we reform Wall Street, when we tackle the problem of preexisting conditions, then, you know, these are tough problems and we have to make choices. And the choices we have made have been ones that are ultimately benefiting middle class families across the country."

Saturday, September 29, 2012

“how they bleed over the national debt”

FORT MYERS, Fla. -- Joe Biden accused Republicans Saturday of hypocrisy over the budget, mocking “how they bleed over the national debt” despite a role in driving it up.

Friday, September 28, 2012

"We're not going to let our campaign be run by fact checkers"

"We're not going to let our campaign be run by fact checkers"


If Obama singled out 47% of America and said that he could not care less about them, He would be called an inciter of riots.


The polls are wrong.  According to REPUBS.  See title for explanation.

Thursday, September 27, 2012

iron man Buddist god carved from meteorite



Posted: Updated: 09/27/2012 11:52 am EDT
By: Stephanie Pappas, LiveScience Senior Writer
Published: 09/26/2012 01:23 PM EDT on LiveScience

It sounds like a mash-up of Indiana Jones' plots, but German researchers say a heavy Buddha statue brought to Europe by the Nazis was carved from a meteorite that likely fell 10,000 years ago along the Siberia-Mongolia border.
This space Buddha, also known as "iron man" to the researchers, is of unknown age, though the best estimates date the statue to sometime between the eighth and 10th centuries. The carving depicts a man, probably a Buddhist god, perched with his legs tucked in, holding something in his left hand. On his chest is a Buddhist swastika, a symbol of luck that was later co-opted by the Nazi party of Germany.
"One can speculate whether the swastika symbol on the statue was a potential motivation to displace the 'iron man' meteorite artifact to Germany," the researchers wrote online Sept. 14 in the journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science.
Iron man adventure
The iron man first came to Germany after a 1938-1939 Tibet expedition by zoologist and ethnology Ernst Schäfer, who was sent to the region by the Nazi party to find the roots of Aryan origin. The statue then passed into the hands of a private owner. [Fallen Stars: A Gallery of Famous Meteorites]
Stuttgart University researcher Elmar Bucher and his colleagues first analyzed the statue in 2007, when the owner allowed them to take five miniscule samples of it. In 2009, the team had the opportunity to take larger samples from the inside of the statue, which is less prone to contamination by weathering or human handling than the outside where the initial samples were taken.
They found that the statue is carved from a rare class of space rocks known as ataxite meteorites. These mostly iron meteorites have a high level of nickel. The largest-ever known meteorite, the Hoba meteorite of Namibia, is an ataxite meteorite that may weigh more than 60 tons.
It came from outer space
A chemical analysis of the iron man samples revealed they are a close match for a famous scattering of space rocks from the Siberia and Mongolian border. The Chinga meteorite field holds at least 250 meteorite fragments, most relatively small, though two topping 22 pounds (10 kg) have been found there. Scientists estimate the Chinga meteorite fell 10,000 to 20,000 years ago. The field's first discovery was recorded in 1913, but the statue's existence suggests people were mining the field for artistic materials long before that, Buchner said.
buddha2120927The Buddha meteorite matches those found in the Chinga meteorite field.
The identity of the carved man is unclear, but the researchers suspect he may be the Buddhist god Vaisravana, also known as Jambhala. Vaisravana is the god of wealth or war, and he is often portrayed holding a lemon (a symbol of wealth) or moneybag in his hand. The iron man holds an unidentified object in his hand. The statue is about 9.5 inches (24 cm) tall and weighs about 23 pounds (10.6 kg).
Many cultures used meteorite iron to make daggers and even jewelry, Buchner and his colleagues wrote, and meteorite worship is common among many ancient cultures. But the Buddha carving is unique.
"The Iron Man statue is the only known illustration of a human figure to be carved into a meteorite, which means we have nothing to compare it to when assessing value," Buchner said in a statement. "Its origins alone may value it at $20,000; however, if our estimation of its age is correct and it is nearly a thousand years old it could be invaluable."

Saturday, September 22, 2012

This may be the first victory in the war on terror


This may be the first victory in the war on terror

Posted by Charles II on September 22, 2012
Conal Urquhart, The Guardian:
Militias blamed for the killing of US ambassador Chris Stevens have been forced out of Libya’s second city, Benghazi, by popular protests.
At least 11 people were killed and 60 wounded as militiamen tried to defend their compounds against thousands of demonstrators protesting against extremism.
Saturday morning’s rout followed a day of demonstrations on Friday against the militias, in particular Ansar al-Sharia, which has been blamed for the murder of the US ambassador and three of his colleagues.

The apparent defeat of Ansar al-Sharia across Benghazi and the huge outpouring of public support for the government marks an extraordinary transformation in a country where the authorities had seemed largely powerless to curb the influence of militia groups armed with heavy weapons.
The US is not occupying Libya. The American ambassador was well-liked because he was seen as an honest broker in trying to get support for the Libyan people in getting rid of Gaddafi. The Islamist militias have been holding prisoners and otherwise oppressing the people of Benghazi.
This is a win in the real war, the war to establish justice for all. As the saying goes, no justice, no peace.

Thursday, September 20, 2012

"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. . . . corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed." Abraham Lincoln 1864

"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. . . . corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by ç Abraham Lincoln 1864



U.S. Income Inequality Worse Now Than In 1774: Study

The Huffington Post  |  By Posted: Updated: 09/20/2012 10:18 am
Us Income Inequality Slavery
Believe it or not, income inequality in the United States is worse today than it was back in 1774.
That’s what a recent report from the National Bureau of Economic Research has found. In “American Incomes 1774 to 1860,” authors Peter H. Lindert and Jeffrey G. Williamson argue that the American colonies were exceptionally egalitarian, compared to both other nations at the time and the U.S. today. And their data even factors in slavery.
As the Atlantic’s Jordan Weissman points out, such studies should be taken with a grain of salt, given that making historical economic analyses is like “making a messy collage, collecting the disparate bits and pieces of information we have available and fashioning them into a coherent picture,” Weissman writes.
But NBER's is not the first study to contend that income inequality today is worse than before. A 2009 study looking at data stretching back to 1917 found that American income inequality was at an all-time high. Likewise, two historians concluded last year that income inequality today is worse even than it was during the Roman Empire. The study found that the top 1 percent of Ancient Roman earners controlled 16 percent of the Empire’s riches, compared to the top 1 percent of American earners today who control 40 percent of the country's wealth.
Indeed, signs of America’s yawning income gap aren’t exactly rare. On Wednesday, just days after the first anniversary of Occupy Wall Street, a movement in part dedicated to exposing the nation's income inequality, Forbes released its list of the 400 richest Americans. Combined, their net worth is $1.7 trillion, or the combined yearly household income of more than 64 million Americans.

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

why dont we bring apple manufacturing to America?

Comparing Apples to Apples

 
 
 
 
 
 
i
 
2 Votes
Quantcast

In order to write this blog and my book Simply American, I read a lot of articles about Made in America issues.  Some of them discuss Apple.   I came across one of these the other day.  It was in the Atlantic Magazine written by Derek Thompson who is a senior editor at The Atlantic.  The article was titled “How much would the iPad 2 Cost If It Were Made in the U.S.? About $1,140.”  
As you may know, the iPad is assembled by Chinese workers at Foxconn, which also assembles Apple’s iPod and iPhone.  Foxconn’s biggest plant is located in Shenzhen, China.  According to Mr. Thompson:
“Average U.S. manufacturing/mining/construction compensation is $32.53/hour as of December, according to the BLS. Research firm iSuppli estimates the iPad 2 costs $10 to manufacture, which – using the $1.11/hour rate – works out to about 9 hours each to complete. If assembly and manufacture took the same amount of time in the U.S. as it does in China (another possibly unrealistic assumption), the cost of making each iPad 2 comes out to $292.77!
Again, according to iSupply, the material cost for the 32gb iPad 2 WiFi + 3g – which sells for $729- is about $325, or $335 including labor, which puts Apple’s gross margin (ex shipping/handling) at 54%. Just using the simple math above, if the iPad 2 was made in the U.S it would cost $617.77, bringing Apple’s gross margin down to 15.25%! Of course, Apple is not in the business of self-immolation, and given their relatively substantial pricing power, they could just make the iPad 2 more expensive, let’s say, increasing the price to the point where their gross margins stayed intact, from $729 to $1,144.02!
It’s a rough approximation, but the final point is uncontroversial: We make stuff overseas because the Chinese are paid 1/30th of our median manufacturing salaries.”
I was intrigued.  And I discovered that, as with most things, the devil of comparing wage rates is in the details.
I clicked on the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics citation Mr. Thompson cited to in his article.  The $32.53 hourly rate he cited was for “goods producing workers” who are workers in the mining, construction and manufacturing industry groups.  That seemed like a fairly high rate for workers assembling electronic equipment like iPads.  So, I dug a bit deeper, but I didn’t need a very big shovel.  I went to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics web page for Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing.  I scrolled down to table 5 entitled Median hourly wages of the largest occupations in computer and electronic product manufacturing, May 2008.  There I found the U.S. median hourly wage rate for electrical and electronic equipment assemblers, which pretty accurately describes the work done by all those Foxconn workers assembling iPads.  It wasn’t $32.53 an hour as stated by Mr. Thompson, but rather $13.34 an hour.  The plot thickens.
Now, if it took 9 hours to assemble an iPad in U.S. like it does in China, the labor costs of assembling an iPad 2 in the U.S. comes out to $120.06 ($13.34 x 9), not $292.77.  Using the correct labor costs of assembling an iPad 2 in the U.S., an iPad 2 made in the U.S would cost $445 ($325 for parts + $120 for labor), as opposed to a Chinese iPad’s cost of $335 ($325 for parts + $10 for labor).  Assembling the iPad 2 in the U.S. and selling it for $729 would  bring Apple’s gross margin down to 39%, not the 15.25% cited to by Mr. Thompson.   Whether  Apple would consider a 39% margin on an iPad 2 to be an act of “self-immolation” is a decision only Apple can make, but most firms that can realize a 39% margin don’t feel hard done by.
Is the idea of Apple making iPads in the U.S. beyond the pale?  While it seems like a distant memory, Apple actually used to make things in this country in places like Elk Grove, California and Fountain, Colorado; in the mid-1990s Apple employed 1,500 in Elk Grove manufacturing circuit boards and desktop computers.  But not anymore.  We should all encourage  Apple to move production back to this country.  Apple sold almost 15 million iPads last year.  Do the math.  15 million x 9 hours.  135 million hours of work for U.S. electronic equipment assemblers assembling iPads for you and me.  A full time electronic equipment assembler works about 2000 hours a year (40 hrs x 50 weeks)  135 million hours of work divided by 2000 equals full-time work for 67,500 U.S. workers.  And all we have to do is to convince Apple that a 39% margin, as opposed to a 54% margin is acceptable.  Hell, I’ll split the difference with Apple.  I will pay $784.oo for an iPad 2 made in this country if Apple will agree to live with a 46% margin.  What could be more fair than that?

Friday, September 14, 2012

ifMitt was president and he took a hard line like he is espousing, there might be a war going on instead of a few protests.                   

Thursday, September 13, 2012

responsibility in speech. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from resposibility of your words. Thats why there is libel laws

Bacile calls the muslim faith a cancer.  thats just not nice.  If someone is fat do you tell them that they are fat?  You say its freedom of expression.  I say there is responsibility for your actions.  I wonder what faith he belongs to? 

mitt's attack was reckless, irresponsible, desperate, intolerant, flawed, and insensitive. and Unpresidential.

and irresponsible. 

Mitt's attack on Obama was dumb.  He basically criticised Obama for the freedom of speech that was used to prevent people from getting hurt or killed.   It is perfectly within our values.   Basically calling the right to free speech to protect our americans from wrong.

Here's the deal guys.  The US does not condone or profess any particular religion.  It's right in our constitution.  And our speech is protected as well so long as it does'nt hurt anyone.

So its perfectly in our rights to feel compassion to people who have been intentionally targeted by assholes who try to stir up problems with other religions, particularly Muslims, not to mention the people who are in danger.   Especially to keep riots from going nuts which happened in Banghazi, you should be able to say whatever you want so long as it doesn't hurt people.

People might get hurt or killed and we should try to avoid that.


This statement was given before the attacks in an attempt to dampen down any possible violence. 


His attack was reckless, desperate, intolerant, flawed, and insensitive.   and Unpresidential. 

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

And the white washing continues

New York Times Wipes Story Detailing Mitt Romney's Attack On Obama

The Huffington Post  |  By Posted: Updated: 09/13/2012 1:15 am

New York Times Mitt Romney
On Wednesday, the New York Times published a provocative story bylined by David E. Sanger and Ashley Parker, leading with the news that Mitt Romney had personally approved the blistering Tuesday night statement on the attacks in Libya and Egypt that landed his campaign in trouble.
But hours later, the newspaper wiped the story out and replaced it with a significantly rewritten piece bylined by Peter Baker and Ashley Parker.
The later version flushed out the controversy with more details, but no longer included a couple key anonymous quotes from people close to the candidate, one who offered the rationale behind Romney's decision -- to call out the Obama administration for supposedly "sympathiz[ing] with those who waged the attacks" -- and another who criticized it.
Originally, the Times reported how a Romney "senior adviser" explained how the candidate and his team "saw what they believed was an opportunity to underscore a theme Mr. Romney had sounded often about his Democratic rival."
“We’ve had this consistent critique and narrative on Obama’s foreign policy, and we felt this was a situation that met our critique, that Obama really has been pretty weak in a number of ways on foreign policy, especially if you look at his dealings with the Arab Spring and its aftermath,” one of Mr. Romney’s senior advisers said on Wednesday. “I think the reality is that while there may be a difference of opinion regarding issues of timing, I think everyone stands behind the critique of the administration, which we believe has conducted its foreign policy in a feckless manner.”
The later version only included the second sentence, attributing not to a "senior adviser" but "one senior strategist, who asked not to be named."
The Times also originally quoted "an adviser to the campaign who worked in the George W. Bush administration" who said that Romney “had forgotten the first rule in a crisis: don’t start talking before you understand what’s happening.” That anonymous Romney adviser, offering criticism of the candidate, is missing from the later version.
The later version -- almost completely rewritten as a side-by-side analysis by NewsDiffs makes clear -- no longer includes those quotes.
While it's not uncommon for breaking news stories to go through a series of changes throughout the day, this piece appears to be atypical. Talking Point Memo editor Josh Marshall, who flagged the changes in a post Wednesday night, suggested the changes to this piece "would seem to require some explanation."
The link to the original story now takes readers to the rewritten version, which includes a list of Times journalists contributing: "Peter Baker reported from Washington, and Ashley Parker from Jacksonville, Fla. David E. Sanger, Jonathan Weisman and John H. Cushman Jr. contributed reporting from Washington, and Michael Barbaro and David W. Chen from New York."
Richard Stevenson, the Times political editor, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
This post was updated to reflect that part of one quote from a "senior adviser" (in first version) attributed to "senior strategist" in later version.

Monday, September 10, 2012

now that's interesting


Communist Leader’s Absence Sets Off Rumor Mills in China


Li Tao/Xinhua
A newspaper ran a photograph on Monday of Xi Jinping, center, addressing students at the Central Party School on Sept. 1.

  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • GOOGLE+
  • E-MAIL
  • SHARE
  • PRINT
  • REPRINTS

BEIJING — The strange disappearance from public view of China’s presumptive new leader is turning a year that was supposed to showcase the Communist Party’s stability into something of an annus horribilis.

Related

World Twitter Logo.

Connect With Us on Twitter

Follow@nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines.

Readers’ Comments

Over the past week, the new leader, Xi Jinping, has missed at least three scheduled meetings with foreign dignitaries, including Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton last Wednesday and the prime minister of Denmark on Monday. So far officials have declined to provide an explanation for his absences.
That set off furious speculation on the Internet that the 59-year-old Mr. Xi’s health, either physical or political, has taken a turn for the worse. Some diplomats say they have heard that Mr. Xi suffered a pulled muscle while swimming or playing soccer. One media report, since retracted, had it that Mr. Xi was hurt in an auto accident when a military official tried to injure or kill him in a revenge plot. A well-connected political analyst in Beijing said in an interview that Mr. Xi might have had a mild heart attack.
Whatever the actual reason, Mr. Xi’s unexplained absences are conspicuous on the eve of what is supposed to be China’s once-in-a-decade transfer of power. It also adds to a litany of woes that have disrupted the Communist Party’s hopes that a seamless political transition would send a signal of stability to the Chinese people and the world at large.
Two unusual political scandals have sidelined people considered contenders for seats on the all-powerful Politburo Standing Committee, most recently including a close ally of President Hu Jintao’s. China’s economy has fallen into an unexpectedly deep slump, confounding government forecasts for a measured slowdown. Party leaders have also yet to announce a date for the 18th Party Congress, the event to mark the retirement of this generation of leaders and the accession of the next, though it is supposed to take place as soon as next month.
Mr. Xi was designated internally as the presumptive heir to Mr. Hu as the leader of the Communist Party, head of state and chairman of the top military oversight body in 2007, a full five years before he was expected to assume those posts. Party bosses have tried to name future leaders well in advance to prevent destabilizing jockeying for power. Smooth transitions are considered by many Chinese as a crucial test of the Communist Party’s longevity, and its leaders are eager to make the case that their authoritarian system can manage China better than a multiparty democracy could.
Analysts who follow Chinese politics say the transition is still likely to happen roughly along the planned lines. They also say that the core leadership team around Mr. Xi is slowly taking shape, with the lineup of the Standing Committee coming into focus as the congress draws near.
But at the very least, the atmospherics are turning out to be far messier than envisioned, with officials stumbling to maintain their usual careful choreography.
Last Wednesday, after Mr. Xi did not meet Mrs. Clinton and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong of Singapore, diplomats said privately that he had a bad back.
On Monday, the situation got odder. Foreign journalists had been invited to a photo opportunity between Mr. Xi and Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt of Denmark. On Monday, however, the Foreign Ministry denied that any such meeting had been scheduled and said other Chinese officials would meet the Danish leader.
“We have told everybody everything,” said a Foreign Ministry spokesman, Hong Lei.
While Chinese leaders often do not appear in public for long periods, canceling meetings with foreign dignitaries at the last minute is highly unusual. Adding to the uncertainty is the lack of an official statement of any kind, with observers speculating about car crashes and heart attacks.
“There’s every sort of crazy rumor about Xi’s health,” said a senior Chinese journalist, who asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity surrounding the case. “But no one is saying anything.”
Mr. Xi’s absence comes during a year when the Chinese political system has suffered serious blows.
This spring, the senior leader Bo Xilai vanished from view, and soon after, his wife was charged with murdering a British businessman. She was eventually tried and convicted over the summer, and his police chief, Wang Lijun, who has been accused of covering up the murder and other crimes, could face trial soon.
The scandal threatened to upset the complex political calculations that underlie the transition because Mr. Bo was popular among an influential wing of reform skeptics, many of whom condemn the country’s widening wealth gap. So even though Mr. Bo’s own case still has not been handled, sorting out his wife and closest associates was seen as an important step to get the transition back on track, implying that senior leaders were united on how to deal with Mr. Bo.
But no sooner had these problems been cleared than one of Mr. Hu’s closest allies was sidelined in unusual circumstances.
The ally, Ling Jihua, had headed the party’s General Office, a position similar to chief of staff. He was expected to be replaced so that Mr. Xi could bring in his own man, but he departed the position unusually early for a job that many saw as a demotion.
Some sources say it was because of a car crash earlier this year involving a Ferrari: his son was at the wheel and died, and two female companions were seriously injured. The episode exposed the fabulous wealth and extravagant lifestyles that some leaders’ family members acquire.
Adding to the uncertainty is that no date has been set for the party congress. Political experts expected the date to be set by now, contributing to speculation that the final lineup of the new leadership remains unsettled.
Party congresses are held every five years, generally in October. In 2007, the year of the previous congress, the October date had been announced by August.
“These are not signs that everything is going well,” said Bo Zhiyue, a political science professor at the National University of Singapore. “Negotiations seem to be going on.”
China’s political system has long been a black box, but its all-encompassing secrecy has begun to seem anachronistic as the country has become one of the world’s biggest economic, political and military powers.
“Authorities are worried about anything that may tarnish the transition,” said Joseph Y. S. Cheng, a political science professor at the City University of Hong Kong. “But this concern is working against their interests; they should come out with a clear statement” about Mr. Xi’s whereabouts.
Mr. Xi could appear publicly at any time and quash the speculation about his status. But for now rumors are replacing real information, with one of the most common being that he hurt his back playing sports. Popular Internet search sites have aggressively removed references to Mr. Xi and have even blocked searches for “back injury.”
One well-connected political analyst in Beijing said that Mr. Xi had suffered a mild heart attack but that it was not serious enough to prevent him from assuming China’s top positions.
“They say it won’t affect the party meeting,” the analyst said.
As if to assuage worries about Mr. Xi’s health, a newspaper on Monday ran a picture of Mr. Xi addressing students at the opening of the fall semester of the Central Party School. The photo and speech, however, were from Sept. 1, the last confirmed date of Mr. Xi’s being seen in public.
Patrick Zuo contributed research from Beijing. Jonathan Ansfield contributed reporting from Beijing.

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Why wasn't Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Tom Delay or anybody from the previous administration invited to the recent republican convention in Tampa

Why wasn't Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Tom Delay or anybody from the previous administration invited to the recent republican convention in Tampa?  Because if you're trying to sell what the republican party "can do for you"  its best not to remind everybody about what the republican party did TO you.


Lets see now, what were their accomplishments?

Only the greatest intelligence failures in history, TWICE, (Connect the dots, sept 11, and NO WMD in IRAQ, and then the greatest financial meltdown in history next to the great Depression from the 1930's, after which they passed the biggest check over to the BANKS who caused it all in the form of TARP (remember that was BUSH and Treasury secretary Paulson) not Obama, who asked and received 800BILLION dollars of OUR MONEY, to which they could not spare one cent back to US, the people who are struggling every day to put AIR  in our tires for 50 cents.  AIR.  And you seriously want me to vote republican?  Seriously?  Get out of here.  NOW

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

oh -oh China snubbed Clinton. and yeah he bent the rules for selfish reasons. Self preservation.


China's future leader takes a pass on meeting with Clinton

China-clinton
BEIJING — In a short, frustrating visit to Beijing, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was stood up Wednesday by the future leader of China and delivered a stern lecture on China’s rights in the South China Sea.
Both China and the United States aired their differences about how to handle the uprising in Syria.
During the third stop in her nearly two-week sweep of Asia, Clinton had hoped to meet with Vice President Xi Jinping, who is expected to get the nod next month to succeed Hu Jintao as China's president.
Xi also canceled meetings Wednesday with the Singapore prime minister and Russian officials, claiming a back injury. Nonetheless, the no-show at the session with Clinton was widely interpreted as a snub.
In advance of the visit, Chinese state media lashed out at Clinton, ridiculing what it said were her efforts to maintain American “hegemony” in the Pacific. Beijing particularly resents U.S. efforts to mediate China's competing claims with neighbors — Japan, Vietnam and the Philippines, in particular — to barren islets and reefs around its waters.

On Wednesday, Clinton reiterated a proposal for a code of conduct to help countries resolve such disputes. But she was shot down by Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi during a join news conference in the Great Hall of the People.
"The position of the Chinese government has been consistent and clear-cut. China has sovereignty over the islands in the South China Sea and their adjacent waters," he said in response to a question.
During the visit, Clinton's fifth to China as secretary of State, she met with Hu and discussed issues that include North Korea, Iran and Syria.
"We haven’t agreed on how to handle Syria, but we haven’t stopped talking about what should be done," Clinton said.
Expectations were low for the meetings, as China is nearly as paralyzed with politics as the United States in a key transition year. Beijing is preparing for the 18th Communist Party congress, at which the new leadership should be named amid an ongoing swirl of political scandals and even a murder plot.
Xi’s cancellation of his meetings Wednesday triggered speculation that something was amiss with his candidacy and censors blocked any reference to “back injury” on the voracious microblog sites.
Also on Wednesday, Wang Lijun, a police official, was formally charged with defection, power abuse, bribe-taking and dereliction of duty. Wang was accused of "bending the law for selfish ends," the state-run New China News Agency reported.
Wang had sought refuge in a U.S. consulate early this year after uncovering evidence that British businessman Neil Heywood was murdered in China last November. Gu Kailai, the wife of a former Politburo member, was convicted of the slaying last month and received a suspended death sentence.
ALSO:

theyve been blaming us and all along it was them.

I am getting really angry right now.
To do changes in this country, we need an American.  What, Obama is not?

NOW THIS IS WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. WHEN COMPETITION IS ELIMINATED (TOO BIG TO FAIL) IS THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS?

Their tyrannical form of "capitalism" destroys the personal incentive, moral guidelines and free enterprise that made America great.