Friday, May 27, 2011

Fluffer

SHannon Moore calls Sarah Palin, a "punchline", says that she is a quitter who doesn't like to work, and is a political "fluffer".

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Palestine needs to turn the other cheek.

the Palestinians need to start with recognizing Israel. That is apparently what the world does not think you will do and it will give you a moral solid ground to which you will be able to have an effect on your deliberations with Israel. you would be in the enviable position of being the first to turn the other cheek. only good things can happen from that.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

what the right is "untethered" to the real world.

Reality based community. - The source of the term is a quotation in an October 17, 2004, The New York Times Magazine article by writer Ron Suskind, quoting an unnamed aide to George W. Bush (later attributed to Karl Rove[1]):
The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." ... "That's not the way the world really works anymore," he continued. "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors…and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."[2]

epistemic closure...

Agnotology (formerly agnatology) is the study of culturally-induced ignorance or doubt, particularly the publication of inaccurate or misleading scientific data. Agnotology: Ignorance; not merely the absence of knowledge but an outcome of cultural and political struggle.



on Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis program to destroy medicare this is what Newt Gingrich had to say "...right wing social engineering..."
Agnotology: Ignorance; not merely the absence of knowledge but an outcome of cultural and political struggle.

where the line is

I think that you should not benefit so much that your benefit stops another human being from financially being able to cultivate himself as a person.

Monday, May 9, 2011

Pontificated Andrew Card, former chief of staff to President Bush, on Obama's visit to ground 0 after taking out Bin Laden. "I think he has pounded his chest a little too much. He can take pride in it, but he does not need to show it so much."

This from the guy who was assistant to Pres. Bush when he went on the aircraft carrier to celebrate "missions accomplished" complete with a banner on the ship behind him as he stood at the microphone podium that said as much.

As Chris Matthews said "at least Obama waited until he had done something before he said anything...."



Sunday, May 8, 2011

change you deserve

Heres the problem with the so- called "bush doctrine" (which can be boiled down to "strike first" if a threat is detected. First of all it's a slippery slope as to what constitutes a threat.

You need a Psychic or a mind reader to tell you the future, what's supposedly going to happen.   How reliable are those really?   Are you really going to start wars based on a a psychics reading?

Second, moral certainty of reaction is weakened according to the Christian principals (to which the right is always trying to hide behind and so staunchly believe in) as a reaction can only be taken from an action.  You can't even decide to turn the other cheek because an action never happened - just a human limited reading of intent - again, a mind reader, a psychic.      In effect you have taken away our ability to practice our faith.  That's bad. 

Man should be judged by his actions alone - not his intent, because unless you are God, you can not truly know what a man's intent is. That is between man and god. You have to allow intent to be judged by god, other wise you have blocked god's judgment, and appointed yourself. Because you never know - a person might 'find religion" and intend not to do what everyone thought he would do.

Thirdly, any intelligence which was used to justify preemptive action has to be 200 percent accurate with absolutely no doubt, with corroboration. It has to be held to an even higher standard to justify preemptive action. Which is basically impossible.

And for those of you who insist that your safety is more important than god's principles that is where your problems come from - from your twisted sense of entitlement.

Monday, May 2, 2011

so what. Bin laden is dead

Today the headlines in the news is that Osma Bin Laden is dead. There are parties in the streets in New York and its all over the news. you know the constant news cycle thats repeated every top of the hour. They are all saying yay he's dead.

Big freakin deal. I'm not buying it.

Just months after declaring he wanted bin Laden “dead or alive,” Bush said, “I truly am not that concerned about him.” So what is everyone getting all excited about?

There are so many other problems out there, the economy, three wars, China the greatest threat to the earth, and the millions of OSAMA copycats. I just can't get that excited about it. end of story.