Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Minimum wage derailed by Republicans over politics

The repubs would rather everything remains stagnant than give you a raise.  


WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans derailed a Democratic drive Wednesday to raise the federal minimum wage, blocking a cornerstone of President Barack Obama’s economic plans and ensuring the issue will be a major feature of this fall’s congressional elections.
Facing the threat of a GOP Senate takeover, Democrats have forced votes on a procession of bills designed to amplify their message of economic fairness. Republican senators accused Democrats of playing politics by pushing a minimum wage measure designed to lure voters but too expensive for employers and sure to result in lost jobs and higher inflation.
“This is about trying to make this side of the aisle look bad and hard-hearted, and to try to rescue this midterm election,” said No. 2 Senate GOP leader John Cornyn of Texas.
The legislation by Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa would increase the $7.25 hourly minimum wage for American workers in three steps until it reached $10.10 after 30 months, with annual increases for inflation afterward. The minimum has been at $7.25 since 2009, with 3.3 million Americans — including disproportionate numbers of women and younger people — earning that figure or less last year.
“We saw this morning a majority of senators saying yes, but almost every Republican saying no to giving America a raise,” Obama said in pointedly political remarks at a White House event with low-wage workers. “And then if they keep putting politics ahead of working Americans, you can put them out of office.”
All but daring Republicans to vote against the measure, Harkin said before the vote, “Who’s going to vote to give these people a fair shot at the American dream? And who’s going to vote against it?”
The answer came moments later when senators voted 54-42 to continue debating the legislation — six votes short of the 60 needed to keep the measure moving forward. Every voting Republican but one — Bob Corker of Tennessee — voted no.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada was the only Democrat to vote with Republicans. That was a procedural move that will let Reid stage a future vote on the measure, underscoring the political value Democrats see in it.
Though Obama backed Harkin’s legislation, the president proposed a $9 minimum wage in his 2013 State of the Union address. That has fueled talk by lawmakers including Maine’s two senators, Republican Susan Collins and independent Angus King, that compromise is possible.
But election-year politics suggests that would be difficult.
Leaders of the GOP-run House have shown no interest in even allowing debate, giving Senate Democrats little incentive to cut a deal. And Obama has recently signed executive orders requiring a $10.10 minimum for many federal contractors, making it hard for him to agree to a lower figure for everyone else.
Polls show that while the overall public favors an increase, Democratic voters strongly support one but Republicans — especially tea party backers — are against it. Powerful interest groups on each side are also against a middle ground, with unions backing a full increase and business groups opposing one.
“We are not going to compromise on locking people into poverty,” Reid told reporters, adding later, “We’ll compromise, but not on the number.”
Republicans in turn point to a report by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, which estimated that an increase to $10.10 could cost about 500,000 jobs in 2016. They did not mention that the report also found the boost would mean higher incomes for 16.5 million earners and lift 900,000 people out of poverty.
“To pay for the raises, the money has to come from somewhere,” said Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyo. “So if you like the dollar deal at your fast food, get ready for $1.50.”
Instead of a minimum wage increase, Congress should work on bills creating jobs, such as allowing construction of the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada to Texas, Republicans said.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said of the bill’s supporters: “These are the same Washington Democrats who have been at the helm of the economy for five-and-a-half years, the same ones who have been bragging about a recovery.”
Democrats note that if the minimum reached $10.10 in 2016, it would mark the first time since 1979 that a family of three earning the minimum would have surpassed the federal poverty line. They also argue that the minimum wage, which began in 1938 at 25 cents an hour, has fallen well below its peak value. In 1968 when the minimum was $1.60, it was worth $10.86 in today’s buying power.
Other Democratic bills that have hit GOP roadblocks this year would restore expired benefits for the long-term unemployed and pressure employers to pay men and women equally. Democrats plan future votes on bills easing the costs of college and child care.
Harkin’s bill would also gradually increase the minimum wage for tipped workers like waiters to 70 percent of the minimum for most other workers. It is currently $2.13 hourly, which can be paid as long as workers’ hourly earnings including tips total at least $7.25.

Sunday, April 27, 2014

the only one doing damage control is YOU mr Netanyahu

Mr Netanyahu is feeling the pressure of the international community's growing impatience with his double speak of wanting peace and yet stealing more land, by force, from the Palestinians. 

He is forced to attack the other side to control the damage to lie that he is acting in the interests of good, when in fact,  he is a thief and a murderer.  Thats why this article is even being written.  It's called 'damage control'.  

He says that a partnership with Hamas is per se a collaboration with terrorists, but he does not know that.  They could change now that they have reconciled with THE PLO and he must give them that chance.  

Kerry says Israel is flirting with becoming an apartheid state.   right on John. 

 Netanyahu Says Abbas on ‘Damage Control’ After Hamas Link





Photographer: Gali Tibbon/AFP via Getty Images
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud... Read More

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas of engaging in “damage control” by denouncing the Holocaust after agreeing to unite with the Hamas militant group that seeksIsrael’s destruction.
“President Abbas has to decide whether he wants a pact with Hamas or peace with Israel,” Netanyahu said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” program yesterday. “He cannot speak out of both sides of his mouth.”
Abbas called the Holocaust “the most heinous crime to have occurred against humanity in the modern era” during a meeting with a visiting American rabbi, according to the official Palestinian Wafa news agency.
“Tear up your pact with Hamas,” Netanyahu told Abbas, in an interview on CNN yesterday. “Recognize the Jewish state. Come back to a real peace process.”  (you mean the one where you kill people and steal their land) that Peace Process?  Is that the one you mean?
Abbas’s Palestinian Authority governs the West Bank, and Hamas governs the Gaza Strip. The U.S., Israel and Europe consider Hamas to be a terrorist organization.
By expressing sympathy for Holocaust victims, “I think what he’s trying to do is damage control,” Netanyahu said of Abbas.
Mideast peace talks that U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry sought to resuscitate are teetering on the brink of collapse. Negotiations reached an impasse this month after Israel failed to go through with a scheduled Palestinian prisoner release and announced construction plans in contested east Jerusalem. Palestinians responded by renewing their diplomatic campaign to broaden international recognition of a state of Palestine.

Talks Suspended

Israel said last week it will suspend the talks because of the Palestinian Authority’s reconciliation agreement with Hamas, announced on April 23. The unanimous decision by Netanyahu’s inner security cabinet may be the final blow to Kerry’s campaign to resolve the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Hanan Ashrawi, a member of the Palestine Liberation Organization’s executive committee, accused Netanyahu of using “flimsy excuses” to scuttle the peace talks.
“He’s trying to find ways out and demonizing the Palestinians,” Ashrawi said on CNN yesterday. Hamas doesn’t need to recognize Israel’s right to exist, as Netanyahu seeks, because Hamas isn’t involved in the peace negotiations, she said.
“The PLO is the body that represents the Palestinians,” Ashrawi said. “Nobody’s asking him to talk to Hamas or even the government,” she said of Netanyahu.

Kerry’s Effort

Kerry, who has been shepherding the talks since last July, declared earlier this month it’s time for a “reality check” on his peace mission if the parties themselves are “unwilling to take constructive steps.” He later told Congress that, while “unhelpful actions” on both sides contributed to the breakdown, Israel’s conduct precipitated it.
The unity deal between the Palestinian Authority and Hamas, the third such pact since 2011, is designed to end seven years of rival governments that emerged in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Abbas has said a Palestinian unity government would abide by the conditions the Quartet of international mediators -- the U.S., United Nations, European Union and Russia -- set for Hamas to join negotiations: renouncing violence, recognizing Israel’s right to exist and honoring past agreements between the sides.
Kerry’s nine-month quest for a peace deal is on hold.
“I think we need to step back, let each side consider the alternatives, and then see if there’s a basis to move forward,” said Deputy National Security Adviser Tony Blinken, on CBS’s “Face the Nation” program yesterday.
“We’re at a point where the parties need to figure out what’s next,” State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said April 25. “It is on them.”

Thursday, April 24, 2014

Seattle Seahawks' treacherous 2014 schedule thwarts repeat bid By Adam Schein



Seattle Seahawks' treacherous 2014 schedule thwarts repeat bid


By Adam Schein
NFL Media columnist
Published: April 24, 2014 at 12:42 p.m. Updated: April 24, 2014 at 02:37 p.m. 134 Likes  |  332 Comments




There's nothing like the NFL schedule release. I love it. The event drips with anticipation, excitement and, of course, hyperbole. You truly start getting revved up for the upcoming season -- five months before it begins. It's beautiful.
The Seattle Seahawks just won Super Bowl XLVIII in remarkably dominant fashion. The roster remains loaded in 2014. Consequently, folks are tossing around the "R" word: repeat.

The NFL's 2014 schedule was released Wednesday. Find out your team's 16-game regular-season slate. Team Schedules


Analysis:


Video:


Tickets:

Not so fast.
Have you seen Seattle's schedule? Have you studied other NFC contenders' schedules?
Some discount the merits of schedule scrutiny in April. I believe the schedule really matters.
Seattle seeks an encore in 2014, but the Seahawks' slate is chock full o' roadblocks that will take a toll on the defending champs. So allow me to explain, Schein Nine style, why the 'Hawks won't even make it back to the big game:
1) An immediate threat to the throne
The league picked an unbelievably delicious opener for fans, with the game's best quarterback facing the game's best defense. Aaron Rodgers returns to Seattle for the first time since the "Fail Mary." And while I respect Seattle's defense -- especially when the unit is playing at home, in front of the rabid inhabitants of CenturyLink Field -- Rodgers is unstoppable. And with Rodgers' midseason injury, we didn't really get to see this offense reach full throttle. Running back Eddie Lacy got better ashis Rookie of the Year campaign went on; just think how well he'll complement his all-world quarterback in Year 2.
2) September looms for Legion of Boom
Before their Week 4 bye, the Seahawks face thePackersChargers and Broncos. That brutal stretch presents three playoff teams from last year -- and three quarterbacks who obviously can sling it. Rodgers andPeyton Manning are two of the greatest of all time, whilePhilip Rivers is fresh off a resurgent season that saw him enter the MVP discussion. And that Chargers game is in San Diego.
Yes, the Seahawks manhandled Denver in the Super Bowl, and yes, Seattle is hosting this Week 3 bout. But this is a completely different Broncos defense, with the additions of Aqib TalibDeMarcus Ware and T.J. Ward -- plus a clean bill of health for Von Miller. And do you think Peyton will be focused for this one?
Seattle easily could start 1-2.
3) Double(-digit) trouble
Difficult start, meet difficult finish. From Nov. 16 through Dec. 21, the Seahawks play six straight games against teams that won double-digit games a year ago:
» Week 11: at Kansas City Chiefs
» Week 12: vs. Arizona Cardinals
» Week 13: at San Francisco 49ers (in prime time on Thanksgiving night)
» Week 14: at Philadelphia Eagles
» Week 16: at Arizona Cardinals (on Sunday Night Football)
Tell me: Which of those teams isn't primed to win 10-plus games again in 2014?
Harrison: Top 14 games of 2014

The 2014 NFL schedule consists of 256 different matchups. Elliot Harrisonpares it all down to the 14 juiciest gems. READ
4) A road to perdition
Have you gazed at the Seahawks' road schedule as a whole? I mentioned the Week 2 trip to San Diego, as well as the roadies against the Chiefs, Niners, Eagles and Cards detailed just above. In between, Seattle also must travel to play the vastly improved Redskins (on Monday Night Football), the developing Rams and a Panthers team that went 7-1 at home last year.
Seattle is a different team away from its raucous fanbase. I think the Seahawks go 4-4 -- at best -- on the road. Especially playing in this division ...
5) Don't sleep on Arizona
The Cardinals beat the Seahawks in Seattle last year. That's no small feat. These Cards are ready to dance.
Seattle is locked and loaded with supreme talent, depth, coaching and upper management. Having said that, the fact is there isn't much separating the Cardinals (who have enjoyed a stellar offseason) and the Seahawks.
Seattle's upside is to win the Super Bowl, but the downside is third place in the NFC West. Arizona willbe a factor in this division. It needs to be discussed.
6) Ram revival?
The Rams were a popular wild-card pick in the buildup to last season. And then Sam Bradford got hurt. St. Louis has two of the top 13 picks in the 2014 NFL Draft, including No. 2 overall. Jeff Fisher is a great coach. St. Louis isn't that far away.

On paper, every team in the NFC West should win at least eight games. It's going to be very difficult for all parties involved to win more than four of the six division bouts. (In fact, 4-2 must be considered success.) If you take theRams lightly, they will bite you.
7) That team by the Bay
It would make no sense to start adding up wins and losses and projecting division standings before the draft. But that doesn't mean I won't do it now. I'm just that kind of guy.
San Francisco has an easier road schedule than Seattle, with the CowboysGiants and Raiders on the slate. Just one of those three teams had a winning home record last season (Dallas, at 5-3).
I think the Niners, so close a year ago, can win the NFC West in 2014. Thus, even with a wild-card bid, the Seahawks would be hitting the road for the playoffs. Again: Different team away from CenturyLink.
8) An absolutely loaded NFC
It isn't just the NFC West that presents viable threats. Look at the talent across this conference. And then look at the talented teams' schedules.
Schein: The division to watch in 2014

Yes, the NFC West is the NFL's best division, but what's the most entertaining? Adam Scheinhas his eyes on ... READ
You can easily sell me on a 10-win season from theSeahawks49ersCardinalsPackersBearsEaglesSaints,BuccaneersFalcons and Panthers. That's more than half the conference.
9) It's tough to repeat
For the record, I think the "competition at every position" mantra espoused by Pete Carroll and John Schneider does keep guys hungry. And Carroll's unbridled enthusiasm obviously helps. But frankly, it's human nature to get complacent after a title.
I think the Seahawks are currently one of the best teams in the NFL. They also might be the second-best in the league in 2014.st team in their division in 2014.

Sunday, April 20, 2014

Chinese Crowd, Furious, Besets Chengguan in Eastern City


Chinese Crowd, Furious, Besets Chengguan in Eastern City

Nearly 1,000 outraged Chinese besieged a group of urban management officials in an eastern city on Saturday, smashing their vehicle with bricks and windows, beating them bloody and unconscious, and then flipping over the ambulance that came to provide medical treatment. 
It was a dramatic and violent reversal to the usual order of events when notorious urban officials, called chengguan in Chinese, get into conflicts with street vendors and pedestrians. Though their official job is to enforce local street ordinances, chengguan have gained a reputation for their arbitrary brutality across China over the years.
On April 19, a group of chengguan in Cangnan county, part of Wenzhou City in Zhejiang Province, were seen to be bullying a street vendor. A passerby, 36 year-old Mr. Huang, began taking pictures of the encounter with his cell phone. One of the officials told him to delete the pictures. He refused. A flurry of abuse, kicks, and punches followed. 
The crowd saw Mr. Huang being attacked, and decided to intervene. Online rumours then rapidly proliferated that “someone was beaten to death by chengguan,” which intensified public anger and drove more people to the scene, according to the Chinese newspaper Southern Metropolis Daily.
When the chengguan attempted to hightail it out of the crowd in their van, they were surrounded. Angry onlookers deflated the van’s tires, while others smashed windows and doors with bricks, rocks, and wooden sticks. The men were dragged out of the van and beaten senseless by the mob. 
Photographs posted to Chinese social media websites show chengguan lying limp and unconscious on the street in a pool of their own blood. Rocks and broken glass litter their van.
Five chengguan were hospitalized, while two went into shock due to excessive blood loss, according to a news release on the official website of the Cangnan local government.
An ambulance came to the scene to rescue the injured chengguan, but was pushed onto its side by the angry mob. Phoenix Television, a Hong Kong-based media agency, created a GIF image of the process.  
More than 100 riot police were dispatched to disperse the crowds at around 4 p.m.; over 10 onlookers have been arrested in connection with the incident, according to the state-run Cangnan News.  
Resentment and anger toward China’s urban management officials has smoldered among the public for years. Reports are common in China of chengguan using excessive force to implement municipal ordinances: injuries and even deaths occur periodically.
On April 9 this year, a 70 year-old man died on the street after being punched and strangled by two chengguan, according to the state run Beijing News. The senior was an onlooker who spoke up for a street vender who was in an argument with chengguan. 
Last July, chengguan killed a watermelon vendor by striking him hard in the head with his own heavy metal counterweight. That took place during an argument as they were trying to make him move locations. Four chengguan were sentenced to 11, 6, 4, and 3 years in prison for “intentional assault.” A large number of Chinese netizens expressed their dissatisfaction with the result, saying the punishments were too light.
Many drew a comparison to the case of Xia Junfeng, also a street vendor, who was executed for “intentional homicide” last September after he stabbed two chengguan to death during a clash. Xia said in testimony that he was fighting for his life as the chengguan set about violently beating him.

“Such tragedies have happened again and again in recent years,” said Duan Xingyan, a user of Weibo who identified himself as a police officer. “The root reason is the severe lack of rule of law in our society.”